Safety and efficacy of a low-dose combination of midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol for deep sedation of elderly patients undergoing ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Proper sedation of patients, particularly elderly individuals, who are more susceptible to sedation-related complications, is of significant importance in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a low-dose combination of midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol for deep sedation in elderly patients undergoing ERCP, compared to a group of middle-aged patients. METHODS: The medical records of 610 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent elective ERCP under deep sedation with a three-drug regimen, including midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol at Shandong Provincial Third Hospital from January 2023 to September 2023 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Patients were categorized into three groups: middle-aged (50-64 years, n = 202), elderly (65-79 years, n = 216), and very elderly (≥ 80 years, n = 192). Intraoperative vital signs and complications were compared among these groups. RESULTS: The three groups showed no significant difference in terms of intraoperative variation of systolic blood pressure (P = 0.291), diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.737), heart rate (P = 0.107), peripheral oxygen saturation (P = 0.188), bispectral index (P = 0.158), and the occurrence of sedation-related adverse events including hypotension (P = 0.170) and hypoxemia (P = 0.423). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that a low-dose three-drug regimen consisting of midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol seems safe and effective for deep sedation of elderly and very elderly patients undergoing ERCP procedures. However, further studies are required to verify these findings and clarify the benefits and risks of this method.

Pharmacological Investigation of Hypoalbuminemia on the Prolonged and Potentiated Action of Midazolam in Rats.

Midazolam (MDZ) is clinically used for its sedative and anticonvulsant properties. However, its prolonged or potentiated effects are sometimes concerning. The main binding protein of MDZ is albumin, and reduced serum albumin levels could lead to MDZ accumulation, thereby potentiating or prolonging its effects. Previous investigations have not thoroughly examined these phenomena from a behavioral pharmacology standpoint. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate both the prolonged and potentiated effects of MDZ, as well as the effects of serum albumin levels on the action of MDZ in low-albumin rats. Male Wistar rats were classified into control (20% protein diet), low-protein (5% protein), and non-protein groups (0% protein diet) and were fed the protein-controlled diets for 30 d to obtain low-albumin rats. The locomotor activity and muscle relaxant effects of MDZ were evaluated using the rotarod, grip strength, and open-field tests conducted 10, 60, and 120 min after MDZ administration. Serum albumin levels decreased significantly in the low-protein and non-protein diet groups compared with those in the control group. Compared with the control rats, low-albumin rats demonstrated a significantly shorter time to fall, decreased muscle strength, and a significant decrease in the distance traveled after MDZ administration in the rotarod, grip strength, and open-field tests, respectively. Decreased serum albumin levels potentiated and prolonged the effects of MDZ. Hence, serum albumin level is a critical parameter associated with MDZ administration, which should be monitored, and any side effects related to decreased albumin levels should be investigated.

Ex vivo gut-hepato-biliary organ perfusion model to characterize oral absorption, gut-wall metabolism, pre-systemic hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion; application to midazolam.

To date, characterization of the first-pass effect of orally administered drugs consisting of local intestinal absorption and metabolism, portal vein transport and hepatobiliary processes remains challenging. Aim of this study was to explore the applicability of a porcine ex-vivo perfusion model to study oral absorption, gut-hepatobiliary metabolism and biliary excretion of midazolam. Slaughterhouse procured porcine en bloc organs (n = 4), were perfused via the aorta and portal vein. After 120 min of perfusion, midazolam, atenolol, antipyrine and FD4 were dosed via the duodenum and samples were taken from the systemic- and portal vein perfusate, intestinal faecal effluent and bile to determine drug and metabolite concentrations. Stable arterial and portal vein flow was obtained and viability of the perfused organs was confirmed. After intraduodenal administration, midazolam was rapidly detected in the portal vein together with 1-OH midazolam (EG-pv of 0.16±0.1) resulting from gut wall metabolism through oxidation. In the intestinal faecal effluent, 1-OH midazolam and 1-OH midazolam glucuronide (EG-intestine 0.051±0.03) was observed resulting from local gut glucuronidation. Biliary elimination of midazolam (0.04±0.01 %) and its glucuronide (0.01±0.01 %) only minimally contributed to the enterohepatic circulation. More extensive hepatic metabolism (FH 0.35±0.07) over intestinal metabolism (FG 0.78±0.11) was shown, resulting in oral bioavailability of 0.27±0.05. Ex vivo perfusion demonstrated to be a novel approach to characterize pre-systemic extraction of midazolam by measuring intestinal as well as hepatic extraction. The model can generate valuable insights into the absorption and metabolism of new drugs.

Correlation of Comfort Score and Narcotrend Index during Procedural Sedation with Midazolam and Propofol in Children.

Background/Objectives: Precise assessment of hypnotic depth in children during procedural sedation with preserved spontaneous breathing is challenging. The Narcotrendindex (NI) offers uninterrupted information by continuous electrocortical monitoring without the need to apply a stimulus with the risk of assessment-induced arousal. This study aimed to explore the correlation between NI and the Comfort Scale (CS) during procedural sedation with midazolam and propofol and to identify an NI target range for deep sedation. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 176 children (6 months to 17.9 years) undergoing procedural sedation with midazolam premedication and continuous propofol infusion. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation of NI and CS values, logistic regression, and receiver operating curves. Results: Median NI values varied with CS and age. The correlation coefficient between CS and NI was 0.50 and slightly higher in procedure-specific subgroup analyses. The optimal NI cut-off for deep sedation was between 50 and 60 depending on the analyzed subgroup and displayed high positive predictive values for sufficient sedation throughout. Conclusion: Our study found a moderate correlation between NI and CS, demonstrating reliable identification of adequately sedated patients.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Midazolam Administration for Antiseizure Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal midazolam (in-MDZ) administration for antiseizure treatment in adults. METHODS: Embase and Medline literature databases were searched. We included randomized trials and cohort studies (excluding case series) of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) examining in-MDZ administration for epilepsy, epileptic seizures, or status epilepticus published in English between 1985 and 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria. The primary outcome was the efficacy of in-MDZ administration, and the secondary outcome was its tolerability. Extracted data included study design, patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with 929 individuals treated with in-MDZ were included. Most studies were retrospective, with their number increasing over time. Administered in-MDZ doses ranged from 2.5 to 20 mg per single dose. The mean proportion of successful seizure termination after first in-MDZ administration was 72.7% (standard deviation [SD] 18%), and the proportion of seizure recurrence or persistent seizures ranged from 61 to 75%. Most frequent adverse reactions to in-MDZ were dizziness (mean 23.5% [SD 38.6%]), confusion (one study; 17.4%), local irritation (mean 16.6% [SD 9.6%]), and sedation (mean 12.7% [SD 9.7%]). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of in-MDZ seems promising for the treatment of prolonged epileptic seizures and seizure clusters in adults. Limited evidence suggests that intranasal administration is safe. Further research is warranted because of the heterogeneity of cohorts, the variation in dosages, and the lack of uniformity in defining successful seizure termination.

Pharmacokinetic study of capivasertib and the CYP3A4 substrate midazolam in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Capivasertib, a potent, selective inhibitor of all three AKT serine/threonine kinase (AKT) isoforms, is being evaluated in phase 3 trials in advanced breast and prostate cancer. This study evaluated the drug-drug interaction risk of capivasertib with the cytochrome P450 3A substrate midazolam in previously treated adults with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received oral capivasertib 400 mg twice daily (BID) on an intermittent schedule (4 days on/3 days off) starting on day 2 of cycle 1 (29 days) and on day 1 of each 28-day cycle thereafter. In cycle 1 only, patients received oral midazolam (1 mg) on day 1 (alone), and days 8 and 12 (3rd day off and 4th day on capivasertib, respectively). Midazolam pharmacokinetics on days 8 and 12 were analyzed versus day 1. Capivasertib, with or without standard-of-care treatment, was continued in patients deemed likely to benefit. Safety and exploratory efficacy analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Capivasertib-midazolam coadministration increased midazolam exposure (n = 21): geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) AUCinf and Cmax was 1.13 (0.97-1.32) and 1.15 (0.99-1.33) for day 8 versus day 1, and 1.75 (1.50-2.05) and 1.25 (1.08-1.46) for day 12 versus day 1. The capivasertib safety profile was manageable when administered with or without midazolam. Two patients had partial responses to treatment. CONCLUSION: The up to 1.75-fold increase in midazolam exposure indicates capivasertib is a weak CYP3A inhibitor at 400 mg BID on an intermittent schedule. Capivasertib was well tolerated; exploratory efficacy analysis demonstrated evidence of clinical activity in this heavily pre-treated population. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04958226.

Epidural administration of ropivacaine and midazolam is superior to intra-articular administration as postoperative analgesia after isolated arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is quite common, previous studies have documented that adequate pain control in the early phases of the postoperative period translates into early mobility and a rapid start of rehabilitation. Therefore, the search for new strategies for postoperative pain control is justified. The aim of this study was to compare intra-articular to the epidural administration of ropivacaine and midazolam as postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft (HA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Double-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trial included 108 consecutive patients aged from 18 to 50 years that had undergone arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with HA. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The first group received intraarticular ropivacaine and midazolam. The second group received epidural ropivacaine and midazolam. The need for rescue analgesia, the postoperative pain experienced, side effects and complications of the analgesic drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: The intra-articular group received statistically significantly higher mean doses of rescue analgesia on the first two days (2.8 â€‹± â€‹1.0 vs. 1.3 â€‹± â€‹0.6 in the epidural group; p â€‹= â€‹0.001). Visual Analogue Scale scores at flexion were statistically significantly higher in the intra-articular group over the entire study period. The intra-articular group also reported a statistically significantly lower range-of-motion 87 â€‹± â€‹15 vs. 102 â€‹± â€‹11 in the epidural group (p â€‹= â€‹0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural administration of ropivacaine combined with midazolam in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with HA was clinically and significantly better relative to rescue analgesia and the intensity of pain in the first 48 postoperative hours when compared to intraarticular administration. There was no difference in terms of adverse effects and complications.

Rectal Sedation With Ketamine and Midazolam in the Management of Uncooperative Children During Dental Treatment: A Case Series and Method Description.

Background In pediatric dentistry, sedation aims to eliminate anxiety to facilitate the completion of dental procedures. Sedation in children is a multidimensional field that includes the child, parents/guardians, and the health care team. The rectal route is generally painless, making it suitable for children who are afraid of needles. This route has several advantages over the oral route, including reduced patient cooperation requirements, a faster and more predictable onset, and less physical trauma than the intravenous and intramuscular routes. This case series aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and success rate of rectal sedation with ketamine and midazolam in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment. Case presentation Ten healthy children with definitely negative behavior were enrolled in this study. Each child was given 7 mg/kg of ketamine in combination with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg by the rectal route. The mean onset sedation time was 9.5 minutes, and pulpotomy procedures were done. Behavioral response was monitored throughout treatment using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS), and the depth of sedation was measured using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). The Houpt General Behavior Scale was used to estimate the treatment success rate based on the overall behavior rating. All 10 cases showed good anxiolysis and cooperation following rectal administration, with no side effects observed. Conclusions Rectal administration of ketamine in combination with midazolam may be considered a reliable method in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment. No adverse effects were observed during or after the sedation procedure.

Combined sedation in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: determination of median effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam.

BACKGROUND: The exact median effective dose (ED50) of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam sedation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in children remains unknow and the aim of this study was to determine the ED50 of their combination. METHODS: This is a prospective dose-finding study. A total of 53 children aged from 2 months to 6 years scheduled for MRI examination from February 2023 to April 2023 were randomly divided into group D (to determine the ED50 of intranasal dexmedetomidine) and group M (to determine the ED50 of oral midazolam). The dosage of dexmedetomidine and midazolam was adjusted according to the modified Dixon's up-and-down method, and the ED50 was calculated with a probit regression approach. RESULTS: The ED50 of intranasal dexmedetomidine when combined with 0.5 mg∙kg- 1 oral midazolam was 0.39 µg∙kg- 1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.46 µg∙kg- 1] while the ED50 of oral midazolam was 0.17 mg∙kg- 1 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.29 mg∙kg- 1) when combined with 1 µg∙kg- 1 intranasal dexmedetomidine. The sedation onset time of children with successful sedation in group D was longer than in group M (30.0[25.0, 38.0]vs 19.5[15.0, 35.0] min, P < 0.05). No other adverse effects were observed in the day and 24 h after medication except one dysphoria. CONCLUSION: This drug combination sedation regimen appears suitable for children scheduled for MRI examinations, offering a more precise approach to guide the clinical use of sedative drugs in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2300068611(24/02/2023).

The role of perioperative sedative anesthetics in preventing postoperative delirium: a systematic review and network-meta analysis including 6679 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative delirium is a common and debilitating complication that significantly affects patients and their families. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is an effective sedative that can prevent postoperative delirium while also examining the safety of using sedatives during the perioperative period. METHODS: The net-meta analysis was used to compare the incidence of postoperative delirium among four sedatives: sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam. Interventions were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: A total of 41 RCT studies involving 6679 patients were analyzed. Dexmedetomidine can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium than propofol (OR 0.47 95% CI 0.25-0.90), midazolam (OR 0.42 95% CI 0.17-1.00), normal saline (OR 0.42 95% CI 0.33-0.54) and sevoflurane (OR 0.39 95% CI 0.18-0.82). The saline group showed a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia compared to the group receiving dexmedetomidine (OR 0.55 95% CI 0.37-0.80). In cardiac surgery, midazolam (OR 3.34 95%CI 2.04-5.48) and normal saline (OR 2.27 95%CI 1.17-4.39) had a higher rate of postoperative delirium than dexmedetomidine, while in non-cardiac surgery, normal saline (OR 1.98 95%CI 1.44-2.71) was more susceptible to postoperative delirium than dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is an effective sedative in preventing postoperative delirium whether in cardiac surgery or non-cardiac surgery. The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium becomes more apparent with longer surgical and extubation times. However, it should be administered with caution as it was found to be associated with bradycardia.

Characterization of Pediatric Rectal Absorption, Drug Disposition, and Sedation Level for Midazolam Gel Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

This study aims to explore and characterize the role of pediatric sedation via rectal route. A pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model of midazolam gel was built and validated to support dose selection for pediatric clinical trials. Before developing the rectal PBPK model, an intravenous PBPK model was developed to determine drug disposition, specifically by describing the ontogeny model of the metabolic enzyme. Pediatric rectal absorption was developed based on the rectal PBPK model of adults. The improved Weibull function with permeability, surface area, and fluid volume parameters was used to extrapolate pediatric rectal absorption. A logistic regression model was used to characterize the relationship between the free concentrations of midazolam and the probability of sedation. All models successfully described the PK profiles with absolute average fold error (AAFE) < 2, especially our intravenous PBPK model that extended the predicted age to preterm. The simulation results of the PD model showed that when the free concentrations of midazolam ranged from 3.9 to 18.4 ng/mL, the probability of "Sedation" was greater than that of "Not-sedation" states. Combined with the rectal PBPK model, the recommended sedation doses were in the ranges of 0.44-2.08 mg/kg for children aged 2-3 years, 0.35-1.65 mg/kg for children aged 4-7 years, 0.24-1.27 mg/kg for children aged 8-12 years, and 0.20-1.10 mg/kg for adolescents aged 13-18 years. Overall, this model mechanistically quantified drug disposition and effect of midazolam gel in the pediatric population, accurately predicted the observed clinical data, and simulated the drug exposure for sedation that will inform dose selection for following pediatric clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam in complex gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for complex digestive endoscopy procedures, with the goal of offering comprehensive clinical evidence. METHODS: Following predefined inclusion criteria, five databases were systematically searched, with a focus on identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the administration of dexmedetomidine and midazolam during complex digestive endoscopy procedures. The statistical software Stata 15.1 was employed for meticulous data analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs were encompassed, involving a total of 1218 patients. In comparison to the midazolam group, dexmedetomidine administration was associated with a reduced risk of respiratory depression (RR=0.25, 95 %CI: 0.11-0.56) and hypoxemia (RR=0.22, 95 %CI: 0.12-0.39). Additionally, the dexmedetomidine group exhibited lower incidence rates of choking (RR=0.27, 95 %CI: 0.16-0.47), physical movement (RR=0.16, 95 %CI: 0.09-0.27), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR=0.56,95 %CI: 0.34-0.92). Patients and endoscopists in the dexmedetomidine group reported higher levels of satisfaction (patient satisfaction: SMD=0.73, 95 %CI: 0.26-1.21; endoscopist satisfaction: SMD=0.84, 95 %CI: 0.24-1.44). The incidence of hypotension and anesthesia recovery time did not significantly differ between the two groups (hypotension: RR=1.73,95 %CI:0.94-3.20; anesthesia recovery time: SMD=0.02, 95 %Cl: 0.44-0.49). It is noteworthy that the administration of dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of bradycardia in patients. CONCLUSION: Compared to midazolam, dexmedetomidine exhibits a favorable safety profile for use in complex gastrointestinal endoscopy by significantly reducing the risk of respiratory depression and hypoxemia. Despite this, dexmedetomidine is associated with a higher incidence of bradycardia. These findings underscore the need for further research through larger, multi-center studies to thoroughly investigate dexmedetomidine's safety and efficacy.

Quantitative T2 mapping-based longitudinal assessment of brain injury and therapeutic rescue in the rat following acute organophosphate intoxication.

Acute intoxication with organophosphate (OP) cholinesterase inhibitors poses a significant public health risk. While currently approved medical countermeasures can improve survival rates, they often fail to prevent chronic neurological damage. Therefore, there is need to develop effective therapies and quantitative metrics for assessing OP-induced brain injury and its rescue by these therapies. In this study we used a rat model of acute intoxication with the OP, diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP), to test the hypothesis that T2 measures obtained from brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans provide quantitative metrics of brain injury and therapeutic efficacy. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were imaged on a 7T MRI scanner at 3, 7 and 28 days post-exposure to DFP or vehicle (VEH) with or without treatment with the standard of care antiseizure drug, midazolam (MDZ); a novel antiseizure medication, allopregnanolone (ALLO); or combination therapy with MDZ and ALLO (DUO). Our results show that mean T2 values in DFP-exposed animals were: (1) higher than VEH in all volumes of interest (VOIs) at day 3; (2) decreased with time; and (3) decreased in the thalamus at day 28. Treatment with ALLO or DUO, but not MDZ alone, significantly decreased mean T2 values relative to untreated DFP animals in the piriform cortex at day 3. On day 28, the DUO group showed the most favorable T2 characteristics. This study supports the utility of T2 mapping for longitudinally monitoring brain injury and highlights the therapeutic potential of ALLO as an adjunct therapy to mitigate chronic morbidity associated with acute OP intoxication.

La adición de midazolam intratecal al anestésico local mejora los bloqueos sensorial y motor y reduce la puntuación del dolor sin incrementar los efectos secundarios en la cirugía de miembros inferiores. Metaanálisis y revisión sistemática / Adding intrathecal midazolam to local anesthetics improves sensory and motor block and reduces pain score without increasing side effects in lower limb surgeries: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Este metaanálisis investiga el impacto de midazolam intratecal en la anestesia espinal, el control del dolor postoperatorio y los efectos secundarios relacionados con la anestesia en la cirugía de miembros inferiores. Realizamos una búsqueda en Medline, Science Direct, Google Scholar y Cochrane Library de los estudios que reportaron el inicio y la duración de los bloqueos sensorial y motor, el tiempo transcurrido hasta la primera solicitud de analgesia, el consumo de opioides durante 24h, el control del dolor postoperatorio y los efectos secundarios tras la administración de midazolam intratecal en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de miembros inferiores. Se identificaron 10 estudios, que se incluyeron en el metaanálisis. La revisión fue realizada siguiendo las directrices PRISMA, registrándose en la base de datos PROSPERO (ID-CRD42022346361) en agosto de 2022. Nuestros resultados muestran que los pacientes que reciben 1mg de midazolam intratecal reflejaron un tiempo de inicio de bloqueo significativamente más alto (p=0,001 [IC: −0,98, −0,31]), mayor duración de los bloqueos sensorial y motor (p<0,00001 [IC: 18,08, 39,12]; p=0,002 [IC: 0,45, 2]), y mayor tiempo transcurrido hasta la primera solicitud de analgesia de rescate (p=0,0003 [IC: 1,22, 4,14]). Las puntuaciones de dolor a las 4 y 12h postoperatorias fueron significativamente inferiores en los pacientes que recibieron midazolam intratecal (p=0,00001 [: −1,20, −0,47] y p=0,05 [IC: −0,52, −0,01] respectivamente). En conclusión, la adición de midazolam intratecal al anestésico local en la cirugía de miembros inferiores acorta el tiempo de inicio de los bloqueos sensorial y motor, incrementa la duración del bloqueo y prolonga el tiempo transcurrido hasta la primera solicitud de analgesia. Las puntuaciones del dolor a las 4 y 12horas postoperatorias fueron menores, no observándose efectos secundarios adicionales.(AU)

This meta-analysis was done to investigate the role of intrathecal midazolam in lower limb surgeries regarding prolongation of spinal block, postoperative pain control and associated side effects. The included studies reported onset and duration of sensory and motor block, time to first request analgesia, 24hours opioid consumption, postoperative pain control, and associated side effects following use of intrathecal midazolam for lower limb surgeries. This review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and using the online databases, Medline, Science Direct, Google scholar and Cochrane library. We registered this review with the PROSPERO database (ID-CRD42022346361) in August 2022. A total of 10 randomised controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed patients receiving 1mg intrathecal midazolam showed significantly faster onset of sensory block (P=.001 [CI: −0.98, −0.31]). Duration of sensory and motor block were also significantly prolonged in intrathecal midazolam group (P<.00001 [CI: 18.08, 39.12], P=.002 [CI: 0.45, 2]). Intrathecal midazolam also increased the time to first request analgesia (P=.0003 [CI: 1.22, 4.14]). Pain scores at 4 and 12hours postoperatively were significantly lower in patients receiving intrathecal midazolam (P=.00001[CI: −1.20, −0.47] and P=0.05 [CI: −0.52, −0.01] respectively). In conclusion, the addition of intrathecal midazolam to local anesthetics in lower limb surgeries results in early onset of sensory and motor block. It also increases the duration of sensory and motor block. The time to first request analgesia is increased. VAS pain scores at 4 and 12hours postoperatively were also lower without any increased side effects.(AU)

Long-Term Satisfaction of Oral Sedation versus Standard-of-Care Intravenous Sedation for Ocular Surgery.

Purpose: Long-term patient satisfaction may influence patients' perspectives of the quality of care and their relationship with their providers. This is a follow up to a comparative effectiveness study investigating oral to intravenous sedation (OIV study). The OIV study found that oral sedation was noninferior in patient satisfaction to standard intravenous (IV) sedation for anterior segment and vitreoretinal surgeries. This study aims to determine if patient satisfaction with oral sedation remained noninferior long term. Patients and Methods: Patients were re-interviewed using the same satisfaction survey given during the OIV study. Statistical analysis involved t-tests for noninferiority of the long-term mean satisfaction score of oral and IV sedation. We also compared the original mean satisfaction score and the follow-up mean satisfaction score for each type of sedation and for both groups combined. Results: Participants were interviewed at a median of 1225.5 days (range 754-1675 days) from their surgery. The original mean satisfaction score was 5.26 ± 0.79 for the oral treatment group (n = 52) and 5.27 ± 0.64 for the intravenous treatment group (n = 46), demonstrating noninferiority with a difference in mean satisfaction score of 0.015 (p < 0.0001). The follow-up mean satisfaction score was 5.23 ± 0.90 for oral sedation and 5.60 ± 0.61 for IV sedation, with a difference in the mean satisfaction score of 0.371 (p = 0.2071). Satisfaction scores did not differ between the original mean satisfaction score and the follow-up mean satisfaction score for the oral treatment group alone (p = 0.8367), but scores in the intravenous treatment group increased longitudinally (p = 0.0004). Conclusion: In this study, long-term patient satisfaction with oral sedation was not noninferior to satisfaction with IV sedation, unlike our findings with short-term patient satisfaction in our original study. Patient satisfaction also remained unchanged over time for the oral treatment group, but patients in the intravenous treatment group reported higher long-term satisfaction with their anesthesia experience compared to the immediate post-operative period.

Oral Dexmedetomidine Achieves Superior Effects in Mitigating Emergence Agitation and Demonstrates Comparable Sedative Effects to Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Premedication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Background: Oral midazolam is the most commonly used sedative premedication agent in pediatric patients. While effective, oral midazolam cannot reduce the incidence of emergence agitation. Oral dexmedetomidine may be effective in providing satisfactory sedation and reduce the incidence of emergence agitation, although the results of different randomized controlled trials are conflicting. Methods: This study enrolled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining premedication with oral dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science database were searched from their inception until June 2023. The outcomes were the incidence of satisfactory preoperative sedation, satisfactory sedation during separation from parents, satisfactory sedation during anesthesia induction using an anesthesia mask, and the incidence of emergence agitation. Results: A total of 9 RCTs comprising 885 patients were analyzed. Our data revealed comparable effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam with respect to satisfactory preoperative sedation and a satisfactory incidence of sedation during parental separation and mask acceptance before anesthesia induction. Notably, our data revealed that the rate of emergence agitation was significantly lower in pediatric patients receiving dexmedetomidine (n = 162) than in those receiving midazolam (n = 159) (odds ratio = 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.44; p < 0.001; I2 = 35%). Conclusions: Data from this meta-analysis revealed comparable effects for premedication with oral dexmedetomidine or oral midazolam with respect to satisfactory sedation; furthermore, premedication with oral dexmedetomidine more effectively mitigated emergence agitation in pediatric patients receiving general anesthesia compared with oral midazolam.

Efficacy of a combined anti-seizure treatment against cholinergic established status epilepticus following a sarin nerve agent insult in rats.

The development of refractory status epilepticus (SE) following sarin intoxication presents a therapeutic challenge. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of delayed combined double or triple treatment in reducing abnormal epileptiform seizure activity (ESA) and the ensuing long-term neuronal insult. SE was induced in rats by exposure to 1.2 LD50 sarin followed by treatment with atropine and TMB4 (TA) 1 min later. Double treatment with ketamine and midazolam or triple treatment with ketamine, midazolam and levetiracetam was administered 30 min post-exposure, and the results were compared to those of single treatment with midazolam alone or triple treatment with ketamine, midazolam, and valproate, which was previously shown to ameliorate this neurological insult. Toxicity and electrocorticogram activity were monitored during the first week, and behavioral evaluations were performed 2 weeks post-exposure, followed by biochemical and immunohistopathological analyses. Both double and triple treatment reduced mortality and enhanced weight recovery compared to TA-only treatment. Triple treatment and, to a lesser extent, double treatment significantly ameliorated the ESA duration. Compared to the TA-only or the TA+ midazolam treatment, both double and triple treatment reduced the sarin-induced increase in the neuroinflammatory marker PGE2 and the brain damage marker TSPO and decreased gliosis, astrocytosis and neuronal damage. Finally, both double and triple treatment prevented a change in behavior, as measured in the open field test. No significant difference was observed between the efficacies of the two triple treatments, and both triple combinations completely prevented brain injury (no differences from the naïve rats). Delayed double and, to a greater extent, triple treatment may serve as an efficacious delayed therapy, preventing brain insult propagation following sarin-induced refractory SE.

Possible Involvement of Protein Binding Inhibition in Changes in Dexmedetomidine Concentration in Extracorporeal Circuits during Midazolam Use.

It was recently reported that the dexmedetomidine concentration within the extracorporeal circuit decreases with co-administration of midazolam. In this study, we investigated whether displacement of dexmedetomidine by midazolam from the binding site of major plasma proteins, human serum albumin (HSA) and α1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), would increase levels of free dexmedetomidine that could be adsorbed to the circuit. Equilibrium dialysis experiments indicated that dexmedetomidine binds to a single site on both HSA and AAG with four times greater affinity than midazolam. Midazolam-mediated inhibition of the binding of dexmedetomidine to HSA and AAG was also examined. The binding of dexmedetomidine to these proteins decreased in the presence of midazolam. Competitive binding experiments suggested that the inhibition of binding by midazolam was due to competitive displacement at site II of HSA and due to non-competitive displacement at the site of AAG. Thus, our present data indicate that free dexmedetomidine displaced by midazolam from site II of HSA or from AAG is adsorbed onto extracorporeal circuits, resulting in a change in the dexmedetomidine concentration within the circuit.

Effects of midazolam on high-frequency oscillations in amygdala and hippocampus of epilepsy patients.

High-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are associated with normal brain function, but are also increasingly recognized as potential biomarkers of epileptogenic tissue. Considering the important role of interneuron activity in physiological HFO generation, we studied their modulation by midazolam (MDZ), an agonist of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA)-benzodiazepine receptors. Here, we analyzed 80 intracranial electrode contacts in amygdala and hippocampus of 13 patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy who had received MDZ for seizure termination during presurgical monitoring. Ripples (80-250 Hz) and fast ripples (FRs; 250-400 Hz) were compared before and after seizures with MDZ application, and according to their origin either within or outside the individual seizure onset zone (SOZ). We found that MDZ distinctly suppressed all HFOs (ripples and FRs), whereas the reduction of ripples was significantly less pronounced inside the SOZ compared to non-SOZ contacts. The rate of FRs inside the SOZ was less affected, especially in hippocampal contacts. In a few cases, even a marked increase of FRs following MDZ administration was seen. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, a significant HFO modulation in amygdala and hippocampus by MDZ, thus giving insights into the malfunction of GABA-mediated inhibition within epileptogenic areas and its role in HFO generation.

Distribution and elimination kinetics of midazolam and metabolites after post-resuscitation care: a prospective observational study.

Administration of sedatives for post-resuscitation care can complicate the determination of the optimal timing to avoid inappropriate, pessimistic prognostications. This prospective study aimed to investigate the distribution and elimination kinetics of midazolam (MDZ) and its metabolites, and their association with awakening time. The concentrations of MDZ and its seven metabolites were measured immediately and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after the discontinuation of MDZ infusion, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The area under the time-plasma concentration curve from 0 to 24 h after MDZ discontinuation (AUClast) was calculated based on the trapezoidal rule. Of the 15 enrolled patients, seven awakened after the discontinuation of MDZ infusion. MDZ and three of its metabolites were major compounds and their elimination kinetics followed a first-order elimination profile. In the multivariable analysis, only MDZ was associated with awakening time (AUClast: R2 = 0.59, p = 0.03; AUCinf: R2 = 0.96, p < 0.001). Specifically, a 0.001% increase in MDZ AUC was associated with a 1% increase in awakening time. In the individual regression analysis between MDZ concentration and awakening time, the mean MDZ concentration at awakening time was 16.8 ng/mL. The AUC of MDZ is the only significant factor associated with the awakening time.